Search for: "Plaintiff(s) v. Defendant(s)"
Results 381 - 400
of 69,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2018, 3:39 am
When analyzing plaintiff’s arguments, the Court quoted extensively from Tatham v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 6:00 am
Lynch v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:56 pm
In today’s case (Winkelmans v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:42 am
In response, Plaintiffs argue that the Court should reject Defendant’s attempt to have its motion treated as one directed to only certain individuals, as opposed to the class as a whole, pointing to Judge Marra’s conclusion in Pendlebury v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
In a continuing trend across the Commonwealth, Judge Kimberly McFadden of the Northampton County Court of Common Pleas granted a Plaintiff's Petition to Enforce a Settlement in the case of Williams v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 7:53 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 10:21 am
In Malibu Media v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:37 am
Rejecting Defendant’s argument, the court reasoned: “The Court concludes that Plaintiffs are prevailing parties, for the purposes of the fee-shifting statute, and are thus entitled to attorney’s fees. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 6:36 am
(Defendant’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Conditional Certification, hereinafter “Def. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:00 pm
In Elkharwily v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 11:09 am
In a memorandum opinion in Sutton v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:14 pm
Judge Sleet granted plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendant’s time-barred fraud and negligent misrepresentation counterclaims. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 8:51 am
In Higgs v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 10:00 pm
In Peterson v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:44 am
Grantley Patent Holdings, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:05 am
As discussed here, the court denied defendant’s motion to compel discovery of plaintiff’s immigration status. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 9:27 am
Jan. 31, 2007) In this case, plaintiff alleged that its former employees improperly used plaintiff's computers, confidential information and trade secrets to divert business from plaintiff to defendants. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:27 am
Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction was granted. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 7:10 am
" Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 9:35 am
Jan. 17, 2007) In this employment discrimination case, defendant sought to probe the veracity of plaintiff's claims by seeking a "mirror image" of plaintiff's home computer hard drive. [read post]
