Search for: "Plaintiff 1 et al v. Wells et al" Results 381 - 400 of 1,699
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Directors and officers, as well as institutional investors, rely on the rule of law and the duty of candor of their lawyers to seek and attain justice through the judiciary process. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:16 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
District Court for the Northern District of California issued a preliminary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs in the case Regents of the University of California, et al. v. [read post]
While the law passed in 2018, it did not go into effect until January 1, 2020, and the Attorney General was not to begin enforcement of the law until at least July 1, 2020. [read post]
Apple Inc., et al., the same court dismissed a claim for enhanced damages on the grounds that, even if the defendant Motorola had the alleged policy of not reviewing third party patents, such a policy “does not per-se constitute ‘willful blindness. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 2:54 pm by Arthur F. Coon
County of Sacramento (Cordova Hills, LLC, et. al., Real Parties in Interest) (3d Dist. 2020) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  We all cite the Lee et al study on identifying terms as trademarks by their placement on the package, but what about replicability? [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 5:55 am by Anita Bernstein
Back to the intersection of abortion and tort: Among the filings that reached the Court at the end of 2019 is Brief of Tort Law Scholars as Amici Curiae in Support of June Medical Services L.L.C. et al. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 6:23 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Apple, Inc., et. al, Case 5:19-cv-05322 (Filed 08/23/19) USDCT-North District California - San Jose Division. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
The U.S. federal court system has established and documented well-detailed instructions on how aggregate, or classwide, damages are determined. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 4:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(Acura of Westchester) et al, and all related litigation in the Supreme Court, New York County under index numbers 110604/11, 650247/12, 650471/12 and 651100/12″ (see NYSCEF Doc. [read post]
”  Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Consolidated Reply Brief at 2, City of Oakland, et al v. [read post]