Search for: "Plaintiff v. Defendant"
Results 381 - 400
of 75,753
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2024, 9:39 am
In other words, a plaintiff wants to hold a defendant liable for the injuries caused by the defendant’s independent contractor. [read post]
12 May 2024, 8:41 am
The case is entitled Hughes et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:56 pm
This time, the plaintiff filed a Schedule A trademark infringement case against a number of defendants in the Northern District of Illinois. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:57 pm
” Generally, a cause of action accrues and the statute begins to run when a defendant commits an act that injures a plaintiff. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 am
The defendants accepted the Eleventh Circuit’s discovery rule and argued that the plaintiffs could sue but could not recover damages beyond the three-year time limit. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:00 am
Facts – This case (Martin-Viana v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:39 am
La Rosa v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
Plaintiff’s opposition, as will be discussed below, does little if anything to refute this argument; instead, plaintiff essentially contends that it is premature to dismiss her claim pre-answer since no discovery has been taken and plaintiff is allegedly not in possession of her entire file from defendants. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:55 am
Defendant CBP has failed to abide by FOIA’s statutory deadlines with respect to Plaintiffs’ request concerning the implementation of the CBP One application and its impact on asylum seekers with disabilities. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:15 am
The jury found for the plaintiffs and the defendants renews a pending motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
(Reason)Today, in Culley v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:45 am
The case is Jamie Allen Harless v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:36 am
In Pinn v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:35 am
The representative plaintiffs, on behalf of 260 individuals (first 240 individuals, and second 20 individuals), alleged that their privacy was violated when an employee of the defendant employer (a health authority) accessed the private information of these individuals that was outside the scope of their employment. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:37 am
If so, then it would have been both fair and legally appropriate to hold that summary judgment, despite the factual issues asserted by the plaintiffs, could and should be granted to the defendants. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Chanthanasinh v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:16 pm
The case at issue is last year’s C P Aquaculture (India) Pvt Ltd v Aqua Star Pty Ltd [2023] VCC 2134. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:01 pm
Seaworld Parks & Entertainment, Inc., in which the plaintiffs allege that the Muppets at the Sesame Place theme park are racist? [read post]
