Search for: "President Judge Determination Cases" Results 381 - 400 of 9,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2009, 4:55 pm
Judge Sotomayor has ruled on just a single case with DUI ramifications. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:50 am by Samuel Issacharoff
Four factors should be used to determine whether a criminal prosecution is warranted and well-advised. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:35 am by Florian Mueller
Samsung (with all the talk there about a two-horse race etc.) have or will read with great interest how Judge Koh, who is also presiding over those Apple v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:53 pm by Ruby Powers
The President’s proposal creates a streamlined administrative removal process for people who overstay their visas and have been determined to be threats to national security and public safety. [read post]
16 May 2016, 7:09 am by Patrick A. Malone
The drug maker settled with Kentucky, paying $24 million over allegations it illegally promoted OxyContin; the citizens of Kentucky had the right to know details of the case to decide if that settlement was fair and reasonable, the judge ruled in unsealing the court records. [read post]
19 May 2020, 2:33 pm by John Floyd
Prosecutors, attorneys, and judges all have a different perspective of what serves the interests of justice. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:25 pm by Philip Thomas
Judge Yerger determined that in order to protect the integrity of the judicial system it was necessary to dismiss Eaton's case with prejudice. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:54 am by NBlack
” Finally, the Committee addressed the issue of whether lawyers may request to connect with judges presiding over a case in which the lawyer Is Involved as counsel or as a party. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
Like modern votes of confidence, English history offers us limited guidance when it comes to determining the parameters for impeaching a U.S. president. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 1:55 am by Dwight Sullivan
At least twice since Judge Lind’s ruling denying discovery, Paul Rolf Jensen has indicated that he’ll seek a writ from ACCA in a further attempt to obtain the requested discovery regarding President Obama’s constitutional eligibility. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 5:45 am by Adam Klasfeld
Law enforcement officials connected to Trump’s many prosecutions have faced threats that other judges found sufficiently connected to the former president’s comments to restrict his speech. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:43 am
"  The ABA Journal also had an article about the case in August titled "Judge Accused of Religious Bias. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 1:15 pm
Responding to intense community pressure, Judge Graddick was determined to fast-track Luong’s case, and he was convicted and sentenced to death in a record 14 months after the crime. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:36 am by The Greatest American Lawyer
In a recent Law.com article entitled "Court's Google Search Did Not Violate Evidence Rules, 2nd Circuit Says", Author Joel Stashenko reports on a case in which a Southern District of New York Judge used an internet search to evaluate evidence in a case. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 8:18 am
What she said could determine whether Keller continues as presiding judge of the state's highest criminal court. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 9:24 am by Seeger Weiss LLP
Seeger Weiss LLP can help determine whether you have a case. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
This post analyzes Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s most significant work-law opinions. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm by Steve Kalar
   By contrast, Judge Hurwitz (nominated by President Obama) authors a vigorous dissent that would uphold the district judge's imposition of the enhancement. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:29 am by Chris Seaton
In fourteen states, that idea doesn’t hold up, as non-lawyer judges preside over many cases, including criminal trials. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 5:00 am
Jefferson County Public Defender Dan Goyette said that considering Kentucky's deep-seated tradition of electing judges, "it seems incongruous" to allow judges who have failed to win re-election to continue presiding over cases involving the same citizenry that removed them from office. [read post]