Search for: "REID v. Reid"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Historians appear prominently in the Supreme Court's decision in Haaland v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:28 am
DiscoveryDev Gangjee, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of OxfordStephen Reid, Head of Intellectual Property at Imperial Brands PLC 15:40-16:00 – The future of trade marks – revisited (Darren Meale)16:00-16:30 – Coffee/tea break16:30-17:15 – Keynote address: Allan James, Senior Hearing Officer, UKIPO17:15-18:15 – Panel 2 – A worthy wordless win or a Clubcard calamity? [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:34 am
Plaintiff has pleaded that, but for defendants' malpractice in failing to advise her properly, she "would have avoided some actual ascertainable damage" (see IMO Indus. v Anderson Kill & Olick, 267 AD2d 10, 11 [1999]), [*2]including sufficient detail as to the "nature of" the underlying claim (see Reid v Druckman, 309 AD2d 669 [2003]). [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am
Moreover, the allegation in the breach of fiduciary duty cause of action that defendants concealed their errors and omissions from plaintiffs does not differentiate that cause of action from the accounting malpractice cause of action inasmuch as “there is no independent cause of action for concealing’ malpractice” (Zarin v Reid & Priest, 184 AD2d 385, 387 [1st Dept 1992]). [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:27 am
Reid Road Municipal Utility District No. 2 v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 3:36 am
Lady Hale and Lord Reed therefore reasoned that when PC Reid attended the incident she considered that the appellant was holding her bag in a suspicious manner. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 3:28 pm
In State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 8:42 am
Therefore, according to Reid v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
” Austin, 237 Ariz. at 210 ¶ 29 (citing Reid v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:56 am
; Zarin v Reid & Priest, 184 AD2d 385, 387-388 [1st Dept 1992]). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:41 am
Hacker and Barbara Reid Hartung on brief. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm
He further added: vii) If the line between legitimate freedom of expression and a threat to public order has indeed been crossed, freedom of speech will not have been impaired by “ruling …out” threatening, abusive or insulting speech: per Lord Reid, in Brutus v Cozens [1973] AC 854, at p. 862. viii) The legislature has entrusted the decision in a case such as the present to Magistrates or a District Judge. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 10:10 pm
Reid, whose great blog is here) -Kathleen Bergin [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:50 am
Reid's Heritage Homes Ltd. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:19 pm
She further notes the potential unconstitutionality of MEJA under such cases as Reid v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 8:50 am
Reid Wilson reports for The Washington Post. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
In Neary v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 11:55 pm
" In the case taken by the high court -- Reid v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:40 am
“McCutcheon v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 9:00 pm
Reid v. [read post]
