Search for: "Range v. Attorney General United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
First, the Good News: the Court called for the views of the Solicitor General in Samantar v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 5:00 am
The firm represents clients throughout North Carolina and the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:19 pm
Johnson’s name is often found in this blog because he has been a fertile source of decisions on a wide range of ADA issues. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
Factual BackgroundPlaintiff is in her late thirties and an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of New York. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 5:29 am
That doesn’t mean there isn’t a better office in flyover land, but then, their United States Attorney isn’t getting the nod anyway, so who cares? [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:24 am
Lauderdale is assisting on the internet pharmacy case, United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:50 am
Bottom line: A covered business method (CBM) proceeding is a post patent grant proceeding at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm
The tribe’s attorney general took measures to exclude the Dollar General employee from the reservation, but the United States Attorney never initiated criminal proceedings. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:49 pm
" Hatfill v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 5:59 am
Crank, Attorney General; Paul Rehurek, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:12 am
Alesi, United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 1:55 pm
The firm represents clients throughout North Carolina and the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
United States as if it put to rest the serious First Amendment concerns prepublication review raises. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
” More specifically, it mandates that “the Attorney General and the [Homeland Security] Secretary, in their discretion and to the extent consistent with law, shall ensure that jurisdictions that willfully refuse to comply with 8 U.S.C. 1373 (sanctuary jurisdictions) are not eligible to receive Federal grants, except as deemed necessary for law enforcement purposes by the Attorney General or the Secretary. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 7:39 am
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:18 pm
Washington (2004)), and a similar issue in the federal guidelines system (United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 7:30 am
United States to review a sentencing rule of the U.S. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm
Washington, D.C. super-lawyer, Gene Schaerr, has filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 7:50 pm
As discussed further below, Blue Calypso, LLC v. [read post]
