Search for: "Real v. Clarke" Results 381 - 400 of 689
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander and one–time U.S. presidential candidate, General Wesley Clark, believes that cyber war exemplifies the tendency for technology to be “ahead of the law” (Adhikari, 2009). [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 6:01 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
In 64-year-old Clark’s case, it should have been made additionally clear to him that, although his only current symptom is age-appropriate memory loss, that investigators might come to suspect that this is a symptom of a neurodegenerative condition rather than normal aging. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:28 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
For other good examples of this balance playing out, see the Eleventh Circuit in Leigh v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:28 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
For other good examples of this balance playing out, see the Eleventh Circuit in Leigh v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 1:30 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The clear reversal of the pro-Convention attitude of the previous Justice Secretary, Ken Clarke was starkly apparent. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:14 am
As set forth in the Prospectus, and elsewhere, the risks associated with the Fund are primarily attributable to the Funds investment in (1) real estate development bonds including speculative andquot;Dirt Bonds,andquot; which are secured only by bare, undeveloped land; (2) below investment-grade securities many of which were not even rated by an independent ratings agency; (3) illiquid securities including Tobacco Bonds; and (4) the Fund used leverage and speculative borrowing strategies,… [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 1:25 pm
Clark, 491 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), and company safety standards (Steinberg v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:52 am by Carolina Bracken
Looking to Strasbourg jurisprudence, he commented, “[t]he ECtHR will only find that the state has acted in violation of A1P1” if its judgment is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” (James v United Kingdom (1986) 8 EHRR 123). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm by Rob Robinson
Cost – A Case for Fixed-Fee, Unit-Based Pricing – http://bit.ly/L9FILJ (Marc Zamsky) eDiscovery Case Law: Judges Get Annoyed When Lawyers Don’t Play Nice – http://bit.ly/LDquTY (Jason Krause) eDiscovery Drama: Stranger Than Fiction – http://bit.ly/QuvHvw (Matt Miller) How Early Case Assessment Can Drive Effective Arbitrations – http://bit.ly/LytKhp (Julie Anne Halter, Bill Zoellner) How To Manage The Costs Of Big Data In eDiscovery – http://bit.ly/Quv4lL… [read post]