Search for: "Reed v. High"
Results 381 - 400
of 662
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
United Tactical Systems v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-11-29: ‘Redskins’ marks cancelled: offensive to Native Amer… http://t.co/0XXxSU3YGx -> Software makers respond to spam law http://t.co/wpiCjwpFTp -> Awan v Levant, Judge finds that allegations by right wing commentator were baseless and made maliciously http://t.co/KCEoD4sH50 -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-11-29 http://t.co/AbSIucbojU -> Google Spain: Article 29 Working Party… [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:04 am
The High Court held in an earlier test case that the lender’s rights of possession under the charge had priority over the “interest” of the occupier. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
Mr Wood’s claim under articles 8, 10 and 11 were unsuccessful at the High Court and he appealed to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
Mr Wood’s claim under articles 8, 10 and 11 were unsuccessful at the High Court and he appealed to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 3:18 pm
In cases like this, not to mention Reed v Reed and Pitman v Nominet, Merpel would like to see the party initiating the proceedings take some sort of sanity check, and/or be made to issue a statement to shareholders, explaining what it was trying to do, and why. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
” [63] (Lord Neuberger and Lord Judge: Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Mance, Kerr and Reed agreed) The decision of the Divisional Court Now the appeal in Beghal brings the issue squarely before the Court. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 7:32 am
Reed and Frontiero v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:55 am
[1] AIB Group (UK) Plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2012] EWHC 35 (Ch), per HHJ Cooke at paragraph 24 [2] Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns [1996] AC 412 [3] AIB Group (UK) plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2013] EWCA Civ 45, per LJ Patten at paragraph 47 [4] AIB Group (UK) plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2014] UKSC 58, per Lord Toulson at paragraph 64 [5] ibid., per Lord Reed at paragraph 137 [6] Canson Enterprises Ltd v… [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:03 pm
Truth and Illusion in the Fracking DebateFrac(k)ing, Parr v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 4:09 am
Gray Reed attorneys, led by Jim Ormiston, represented Plains. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 11:27 am
The players who filed suit in this latest round of complaints have all opted out of a settlement class in a prior class action suit, Dryer v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
.* The Copyright and Technology contest has now a winnerOn 1 October 2014 the London offices of Reed Smith LLP are hosting the 1-day Copyright and Technology conference, which promises to be very engaging and carries a discounted registration fee for IPKat readers. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
The winner will receive a ticket to the 1-day conference Copyright and Technology taking place at Reed Smith LLP’s London offices on 1 October 2014. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
In Thoburn v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
