Search for: "Reid v. Reid"
Results 381 - 400
of 963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2009, 1:48 pm
4) Judicial activism v. judicial restraint. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:01 am
Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738 [1985]; Zarin v Reid & Priest, 184 AD2d 385, 386-387 [1992]). [read post]
28 May 2011, 8:30 am
Peoples v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
Reid & Priest, 184 A.D.2d 385 (1992). [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:34 pm
Grant & Co. v Srogi and Hightower v Reid. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:05 am
New California Case Last month in Reid v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 10:42 am
Senior Judge John Ferren wrote the opinion, and was joined by then-Associate Judges Inez Reid and Noel Kramer. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 10:30 pm
The court referred to Santam Versekeringsmaatskappy Bpk v Byleveldt 1973 (2) SA 146 (A) and the English case of Parry v Cleaver 1970 A.C. 1, and quoted Lord Reid: “It would be revolting to the ordinary person’s sense of justice, and therefore contrary to public policy, that the sufferer should have their damages reduced so that they could gain nothing from the benevolence of friends or relatives or of the public at large and that the only gainer would be the… [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 10:21 pm
Reid Mach., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm
"Collateral estoppel precludes a party from relitigating in a subsequent action or proceeding an issue clearly raised in a prior action or proceeding and decided against that party or those in privity, whether or not the tribunals or causes of action are the same" (Reid v Reid, 198 AD3d 993, 994). [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm
"Collateral estoppel precludes a party from relitigating in a subsequent action or proceeding an issue clearly raised in a prior action or proceeding and decided against that party or those in privity, whether or not the tribunals or causes of action are the same" (Reid v Reid, 198 AD3d 993, 994). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:21 pm
Reid Road Mun. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:48 pm
In Reid v Covert, the Court held that civilian dependents accompanying the armed forces overseas in time of peace were not triable by court-martial for capital offenses. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm
The Queen, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 29; Reid v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
” “Here, the defendant demonstrated that both this action and the 107-07 action arise from similar transactions, concern the same parties, and involve common questions of law and fact (see Rhoe v Reid, 166 AD3d at 920). [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:12 pm
Verdugo-Urquidez (1990), might have expected that when give the chance, he would reconcile the two lines with a midway approach; that is, by taking the lead of Justice John Marshall Harlan in Reid v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 1:17 pm
Additionally, plaintiff’s damages were speculative as he provided no basis for his calculations (see id.; Zarin v Reid & Priest, 184 AD2d 385, 387-388 [1st Dept 1992]). [read post]
