Search for: "Rogers v. Paul"
Results 381 - 400
of 500
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am
The WSJ also has a review of David Clay Large's, Munich 1972: Tragedy, Terror, and Triumph at the Olympic Games and a review of Andrew Gumbel and Roger G. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm
” In a working paper, Steven Salop, professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, and several coauthors discussed the impacts of Ohio v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
Karp and Sabastian V. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:10 am
This development follows a recent problematic decision by the 2nd Circuit in AFSCME v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 12:54 am
".The IPKat, who thanks James Gray (Withers & Rogers LLP) for spotting this, wonders whether the 2001: A Space Odyssey clip constitutes an enabling disclosure. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
Cases such as R v Nygaard, 1989 CanLII 6 (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 1074, R v Jacquard, 1997 CanLII 374 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 314, and R v More, 1963 CanLII 805 (MBCA) have helped us establish notions of what “planned and deliberate” murder entails. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am
Paul, MN : Thomson/West, c2010.Criminal ProcedureKF9625 .W75 2010The Miranda ruling : its past, present, and future / Lawrence S. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
. : Bloomsbury Press, 2010.Civil RightsKF4155 .S77 2010Mendez v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
.] : Pennsylvania Bar Institute, c2011Employment LawKF3464 .S425 2010 Mastering employment discrimination law / Paul M. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:07 am
In Rozenblat v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
., retired Justice John Paul Stevens gently bounds into the courtroom. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
Nor did Paul Molitor’s admitted cocaine use keep him out of the Hall.Of course, none of them used banned substances for performance enhancement ? [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the… [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Gillespie v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm
Argument of Roger S. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Hilton, Marie-France Bich, Paul Vézina, Geneviève Marcotte et Jacques R. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 11:05 pm
Paul Schiff Berman: A jurisprudence across borders Discussant: Jean-Philippe ROBE V. [read post]
