Search for: "Rogers v. Wells"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,670
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2021, 7:02 am
At the outset, he summed up the case by noting that, having agreed to buy our clients’ cattle through Rogers, defendants “shorted Plaintiffs, refusing to pay, and claimed that Rogers was a ne’er do well, actually in the midst of defrauding Defendants through a sort of cattle-shifting Ponzi scheme. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:04 pm
The case is titled Hearst Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 5:57 pm
I just noticed on SSRN this new paper on how well (or should I say how poorly) lower courts are implementing the Eighth Amendment capital ruling barring the execution of mentally retarded defendants. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 8:25 am
Rogers, No. 10-10). [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
Rogers, 596 S.W.2d 87, 90–91 (Tenn. 1980); W. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
Similarly, Sulzer Mixpac AG v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 4:29 am
Marcinkowska v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
An attorney for defendant Polk County Recorder Brien, Roger J. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
In Rodgers v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 3:49 pm
” See also United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit’s 1989 decision in Rogers v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 5:59 am
See Morrison v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:02 am
EA created the mechanism by which the virtual player could be altered, as well as the multiple permutations available for each virtual player image, the court noted.Rogers TestBecause EA’s use of Hart’s likeness was clearly related to the game and not simply an advertisement for an unrelated product, the court determined that the right of publicity claim also was barred under the test developed in Rogers v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 5:17 am
In Rogers v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:01 am
Concurring Opinions will have an online symposium regarding Turner v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
In Richmond Newspapers v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:36 am
Richard v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:48 am
In Lucky Star Ltd v Lucky Brands (Pty) Ltd and others, Judge Owen Rogers, of the High Court at the foot of a mountain, deftly dealt with a claim of primary trade mark infringement, as well as dilution, of the applicant’s iconic LUCKY STAR word as well as device marks registered in respect of, amongst others, fish products, fresh salads and retail services. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:28 pm
Hart v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 12:04 pm
Rogers explains why.In Texas Farm Bureau v. [read post]
