Search for: "Ronning v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 501
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 6:55 am
Here I take no position on whether recent protect-the-speech-we-hate decisions like United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:03 pm
(Herring v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:19 pm
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (“NDLON”), 2011 WL 381625 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:04 pm
The websites that have apparently assisted in the illegal viewing of sports games that were subject to the seizure under Title 18 of the United States Code included channelsurfing.nehq-streams.com, firstrow.net, ilemi.com and rojadirecta.org. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 10:01 pm
Shah (Ron Coleman’s LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION) [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:27 am
With New York finally following the rest of the states in 2009, all 50-states now have "no fault" divorce laws on the books. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
(PatLit) United States US General USPTO launches websites to discuss patent and trademark procedures (inovia) US Patent Reform Will patent reform come up in a big way in the 112th Congress? [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:42 am
With New York finally following the rest of the states in 2009, all 50-states now have "no fault" divorce laws on the books. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:21 am
But they had included a note with their bid documents essentially stating that their pricing was based on a certain amount of backfill type fill but if more stone fill was in fact required then their unit price was to be adjusted. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:21 am
But they had included a note with their bid documents essentially stating that their pricing was based on a certain amount of backfill type fill but if more stone fill was in fact required then their unit price was to be adjusted. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:59 am
Despite still believing Assange’s actions have been harmful, I have now come to the opposite conclusion—not for the benefit of Assange, but for the benefit of Americans and of the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:01 pm
My favorite example is the 1968 case of United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am
(IP Dragon) China cracks down on software piracy (PlagiarismToday) Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules wrongful use of AdWord will infringe trade mark (Class 46) Europe EPO and Google partner up on patent translations (Inovia IP) (IPKat) (IP Osgoode) L’Oréal v eBay: What the Advocate General says (IPKat) Rapidshare hit with Euro 150,000 fine (PlagiarismToday) France Google loses French trademark appeal against Luteciel and Viaticum (Ron… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has developed and applied a 2-prong test “drawn directly from the wording of §501(c)(3) and the legislative history of its enactment. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
– IPO consultation (Class 99) Reform of IP taxation – consultation underway (IP finance) The PCC Page no.8: Last chance to make your voice heard – consultation on the proposed limit on recoverable damages in the Patents County Court (PatLit) United States US General USPTO launches Twitter account (Patent Docs) US Patent Reform ‘Patent reform’ still possible in 2010?!? [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
., 1943-Boulder, CO : Westview Press, c2011.AfricaKQC90 .M88 2010The golden book : philosophy of law for Africa creating the National State of Africa under God : the key is the number seven. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:30 am
The United States government has significantly ramped up its efforts to combat counterfeiting and piracy, shutting down dozens of websites linked to the sale or distribution of fake goods, as well as sites that facilitate online file-sharing. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:09 am
Justice Ginsburg (picture, left) stated"What earthly sense would it make to prefer goods that are manufactured abroad over those manufactured in the United States? [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:38 am
The Zaleppa Court further emphasized that the jury did not enter any award for past medical expenses.The Superior Court held that there was no legal basis under either federal or Pennsylvania law to assert the interests of the United States government as to the reimbursement of Medicare liens. [read post]
