Search for: "Rosenberg v. Rosenberg"
Results 381 - 400
of 635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2010, 4:00 am
He argued that the clause was indistinguishable from clauses enforced in other dissolution cases including Ehrlich v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Courts of Appeal after Blakely v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:23 am
Schindler v Isller & Schrage, P.C., 262 AD2d 226 [1st Dept 1999], lv dismissed 94 NY2d 791 [1999] [plaintiff granted judgment on Judiciary Law § 487 claim as defendant law firm knowingly withheld crucial information from court in underlying action]; cf Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696 [2d Dept 2018] [defendant attorney was properly denied summary dismissal of Judiciary Law § 487 claim based on allegations that he filed blatantly deficient accounting with court, which… [read post]
30 Mar 2019, 6:05 am
The slides of the event are here.Next week there are two AIPPI UK events On Tuesday night, there is a blockbuster cast discussing the latest SPC developments including Charlotte May QC and David Rosenberg (register here). [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:12 am
Registration for each event is in the links below:Seminar 1: Art, Law and Social Justice (Thursday 26 May 3:00-6:30 pm BST)Pierangelo Blandino (University of Lapland)Through a Legal Lens: Law, History, and Visual CultureElena Cooper (University of Glasgow)Art, Copyright and Justice in the Nineteenth Century: Connecting Abraham Solomon’s ‘Waiting for the Verdict’ and ‘Not Guilty’ (1857) to Graves’ Case (1869)Marcus V. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:30 am
Susan RainesSession 3C | Trusted Navigation and Career Support: The Career Counseling Ombuds, Don LubachSession 3D | Creating Change When the Sun Doesn't Shine in Your Institution, Sarah Klaper, Katherine Greenwood, & Jessica Kuchta-MillerSession 3E | Divided We Fall: Tackling Polarization in the Workplace, Rachel Nicholson & Christopher Artis Session Block 4 Session 4A | Internal v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:46 am
In FCC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 1:17 pm
When it comes to generally available student group funding, Southworth and Rosenberger v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
In Employment Division v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 4:19 am
Where a cause of action under Judiciary Law§ 487 is based on allegations of false statements in pleadings, a party may prevail by establishing that “the lawsuit could not have gone forward in the absence of the material misrepresentation, [and] that party’s legal expenses … may be treated as the proximate result of the misrepresentation” (Amaltifano v Rosenberg, 12 NY3d 8, 15 [2009]). [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Dunsmuir v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:10 am
More coverage of Monday’s ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:03 pm
Rosenberg v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
At the Associated Press, Joyce Rosenberg reports that the court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:57 pm
Rosenberg v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm
On 23 March 2022 Steyn J heard an application in the case of QRT -v- JBE QB-2022-000825. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 11:08 am
The latest in the Brummer v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 9:53 am
, Rosenberger v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am
[w]ilfully delays his client’s suit with a view to his own gain; or, wilfully receives any money or allowance for or on account of any money which he has not laid out, or becomes answerable for, [i]s guilty of a misdemeanor, and [is liable for] treble damages, to be recovered in a civil action” (Judiciary Law § 487; see Amalfitano v Rosenberg, 12 NY3d 8, 14 [2009]). [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Gerald Rosenberg bases his controversial claim that lawyers cannot bring about substantial social change on the impact of Brown v. [read post]
