Search for: "Royal v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton… [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
In Mohammad v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:03 am
The former Australian Prime Minister is calling for a royal commission into the dominance of the Murdoch media empire. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am
On Friday 23 October, the Supreme Court will hand down the judgment of R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 4:49 am
But it can't necessarily count on support from the courts.On Monday, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California will hold a case management conference relating to multiple App Store antitrust cases pending before her.Epic Games v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 2:17 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 2:17 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 2:17 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony… [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:42 am
The head of the Spanish state, King Felipe VI, represents the unity and continuity of the state’s institutions. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 7:13 pm
In discussing the best interests of the child in Young v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am
Murphy, Austrian Supreme Court revisits football screening in pubs | Dutch State not liable for incorrect interpretation of private copying exception, says Hague Court of Appeal | West African Cotton Company Limited v Hozelock Exel: How may a petitioner establish lack of novelty of a registered design in Nigeria? [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:57 am
There have been further filings since the Epic Games v. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am
The case at issue was an opposition to an application of a mark combining the sign “V” with words “Valentino Rudi” by the Italian high end fashion company Valentino. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:52 pm
The decision of Bacardi & Company Limited v Dickinson Distribution Group Pty Ltd [2020] ATMO 117 (1 July 2020) confirms the acceptance of the similarity between goods in classes 32 and 33, and in particular accepts that gin is similar to beer. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:52 pm
The decision of Bacardi & Company Limited v Dickinson Distribution Group Pty Ltd [2020] ATMO 117 (1 July 2020) confirms the acceptance of the similarity between goods in classes 32 and 33, and in particular accepts that gin is similar to beer. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 7:59 pm
These changes were part of the legal omnibus Bill 161, which received Royal Assent on July 8, 2020. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 5:30 am
Apple vote appeared to dissuade Judge Gonzalez Rogers from considering Epic v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 8:11 pm
” The Ontario Superior Court of Justice just released a new decision in CCLA v. [read post]
