Search for: "S. Baker" Results 381 - 400 of 13,628
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2023, 8:37 pm by JD Hull
Little Orphan Annie and Sweet Sue too They've been coming around Gives 'em somethin' to do Their mamas all warned 'em not to come to town It got into their blood Now they gonna get down Shakin' street it's got that beat Shakin' street where all the kids meet Shakin' street it's got that sound Shakin' street say you gotta get down Streetlight Sammy decided to make the trip All the way from New Jersey On his… [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm by Mark Movsesian
Ashers Bakery (2018), the UK Supreme Court drew the same distinction in ruling that UK anti-discrimination law did not require a baker to design a cake with a pro-same sex marriage message. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:21 am by Matrix Law
W80’s account was that during the intervention, Mr Bakers hands moved quickly up to a shoulder bag on his chest. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:59 pm by Stewart Baker
For Cybertoonz's comment on Google's response, see below. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:29 pm by Josh Blackman
Now, did Justice Gorsuch's opinion resolve whether a baker is involved in expressive speech? [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 10:38 am by Bruce Clark
The product was distributed to Kroger Stores in the following states: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Mississippi, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia; and under the following banners: Bakers, Dillons, Food 4 Less, FoodsCo, Fry’s, Gerbes, Jay C, Mariano’s, Metro Market, Pay Less, Pick n’ Save, Ralphs, Ruler, and Smith’s from November 06,… [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 7:33 pm by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated the lower court's judgment and remanded the case to the Oregon Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision the same day in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am by Michael C. Dorf
Because we could not show this for the fatal encounter involving my client Jordan Baker, and even though the officer admitted race was a factor he considered when stopping Baker, that did not matter under the law. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:51 pm by Stewart Baker
The post Stewart Baker and Max Schrems Debate the Privacy Framework appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:24 am by Amy Howe
” The court’s decision came just over five years after its ruling in the case of another Colorado resident, Jack Phillips, a baker who refused to make a custom cake for a same-sex couple because he believed that doing so would violate his religious beliefs. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:53 am by Michael C. Dorf
We can assume that the Court as currently constructed will think that bakers engage in expressive conduct. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am by Eugene Volokh
We analogize in that brief to speech restrictions, where First Amendment law must decides what's a restriction on speech and what on constitutionally unprotected conduct: A town, for instance, can't ban live performances, newspapers, or photographers, or limit their number; but the First Amendment doesn't stop it from banning or limiting hotels, caterers, limousine drivers, bakers, florists, and the like. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:40 pm
There's a split on this issue, and the 5th weighed in a couple days ago in this pub'd opinion, siding with the majority view (abuse of discretion).Finally, there's this interesting unpub from 2/5 yesterday, which includes a concurring opinion from Justice Baker, about stipulated temporary judges. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 2:32 pm by News Desk
It was also distributed under the following banners: Bakers, Dillons, Food 4 Less, FoodsCo, Fry’s, Gerbes, Jay C, Mariano’s, Metro Market, Pay Less, Pick n’ Save, Ralphs, Ruler, and Smith’s from Nov. 6, 2022 to March 16, 2023. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by Neil Schoenherr
” Other members of the search committee are: Scott Baker, the William F. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm by NARF
Baker and Mathew (Tribal Jurisdiction; Younger Abstention Doctrine) United States v. [read post]