Search for: "S. R.C. T." Results 381 - 400 of 520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2013, 11:39 am by Stephen Bilkis
The parties have two children, R.C., born on August 3, 1994, and S.C., born on 14 February 1998. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
boil•er•plate (boi l r-pl t ) n. 1. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:51 am by Venkat
CoxFacebook Posting of Criminal Trial's Witness List Isn't a "True Threat"--US v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 11:20 am
Students in Niagara Region won’t be getting those Gideon Bibles so many Canadians remember receiving in class unless their local school board agrees to let atheists distribute their own materials.That’s the word from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, which ruled on an atheist father’s challenge to the long-standing practice of distributing Gideon Bibles in schools last week in R.C. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  Id. at *45-46.But we don’t want just to discuss yucky cases, so we’re bookending Block with another pain pump decision, Prather v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
      Now Ohio has passed its own version of the Nonrecourse Mortgage Loan Act with language virtually identical to Michigan’s. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
 1 s’applique à la propriété intellectuelle (..), elle visait ainsi à la protection de droits garantis par la Convention ou ses Protocoles” ([40]). [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 10:28 am
“Başlatılan takip işlemi” ifadesi, tamamlanmış işlemlerin önceki Kanuna, yapılmamış işlemlerin yeni Kanuna; tamamlanmamış usûl işlemlerine yeni Kanunun uygulanacağını düzenleyen Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu m. 448’ten farklı olarak başlatılmış ancak henüz sonuçlanmamış işlemlerin ise önceki Kanuna tâbi olacağı… [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm by Lisa Whittaker
The Supreme Court disagreed, concluding that: R.C. 4123.90 when viewed in conjunction with R.C.4123.95 and read in pari materia, places an implicit affirmative responsibility on an employer to provide its employee notice of the employee's discharge within a reasonable time after the discharge occurs in order to avoid impeding the discharged employee's 90-day notification obligation under R.C.4123.90. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by DaytonDUI
 However, the prohibited concentration for whole blood is a concentration equal to or exceeding .096%, R.C.4511.19(A)(1)(c). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  It’s not clear that Steinfurth made this precise argument, but it’s pretty clear that it wouldn’t have done him any good if he had; in State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 8:25 am
"It would have been a duplicative and burdensome paperwork exercise for producers and clearly was an effort to undermine court decisions that said producers who don't discharge into waterways don't need a CWA permit. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:37 am by Joe Koncelik
  Ohio EPA takes the legal position that this material is regulated as a waste under R.C. 6111. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
”  That wasn’t done in King, and it wasn’t done in Ramey, so that’s the end of it; there’s no such thing as an “implied waiver. [read post]