Search for: "S. v. D." Results 381 - 400 of 62,633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2008, 9:24 am
Cantrell v Wycombe District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 866; [2008] WLR (D) 269 “A positive convenant could not be enforced against the successor in title of the covenantor in common law even though the agreement had been made with express reference to s 609 of the Housing Act 1985 to disapply the common law prohibition. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 9:32 am
Regina v IB Â [2009] EWCA Crim 2575; [2009] WLR (D) 357 "A 'cartel offence' under s 188 of the Enterprise Act 2002 was not a 'national competition law' within the meaning of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, so that a Crown Court had jurisdiction to try a prosecution for such an offence although it was not [...] [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:07 pm
  But, like the Constitutionally protected right to privacy established in Roe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:19 am by tracey
Regina (T) v Merton London Borough Council: [2012] EWHC 2055 (Admin);   [2012] WLR (D)  256 “Paragraph 65 of the Special Guardianship Guidance required a local authority to consider the National Fostering Network’s minimum allowances paid in relation to foster carers and to use them as a starting point when determining the level of financial support payable to a person acting in the capacity of a special guardian pursuant to the provisions of… [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:15 am by tracey
Spaceright Europe Ltd v Baillavoine and another: [2011] EWCA Civ 1565;  [2011] WLR (D)  369 “The company administrator’s dismissal of a company employee when it had gone into administration could be for a reason connected with the transfer of a business, for the purposes of regulation 7(1) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, and constituted an automatic dismissal of the employee, even if the… [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:32 am by sally
Selwood v Durham County Council and others [2012] EWCA Civ 979; [2012] WLR (D) 231 “When determining whether a defendant owed a common law duty of care to a claimant in respect of the actions of a third party on the basis of foreseeability, proximity and fairness, justice and reasonableness, in accordance with the test laid down in Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605, there was no need to show that the defendant had assumed any responsibility for the… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 9:39 am
Aspinall's Club Ltd v Al-Zayat (No 2) [2008] EWHC 2101 (Comm); [2008] WLR (D) 301 “A fixed-term deferral or postponement of a sum owed to a gaming club by a patron amounted to the providing or allowing of credit contrary to s 16(1)(b) of the Gaming Act 1968. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:12 am
Consequently the court found that the Defendant’s use of Plaintiff’s photographs qualified as fair use. [read post]