Search for: "SCHERING-PLOUGH" Results 381 - 400 of 404
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Because Bexis is updating chapter two (information-based claims) of his book, he has some ideas for some shorter lists of interesting cases. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Schering-Plough Corp., California Supreme Court – existence of “presumption of reliance” in consumer fraud class actions·                     Caldwell v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am by Beck, et al.
This post is about un-preempted fraud on the FDA claims and how to approach them…. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
As we said last week, because it’s a Dechert case, we can’t comment directly on Clark v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
, Schering-Plough Corp – Following dispute over trade dress with Schering-Plough, Fruit of the Earth announces plan to change its package design: (IP Law360), US: Quanta and its impact on biotechnology: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), US: BIO files amicus brief asking CAFC to cabin in scope of KSR and hold that its obvious to try dicta does not abrogate the Deuel standard: In re Kubin: (Patently-O), US: StemCells gets patent on enriched central… [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
This post is largely about drug and medical device litigation "inside baseball. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by Bexis
”  Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
In a crushing blow to consumers, on Thursday, February 21st, the United States Supreme Court again sided with big pharmaceutical medical device makers. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Regular readers know that we've been keeping two "scorecards" - one for drug preemption, and one for device preemption. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
Schering-Plough Corp., No. 06-06823, 2007 WL 1839789 (N.D. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am by Bexis
Here’s a dirty little secret – plaintiffs’ lawyers really love preemption. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
Schering-Plough Corp., 842 A.2d 174, 178 (N.J. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm by Barry Barnett
Blawgletter wrote a paper class cert in antitrust cases for a Practising Law Institute program that went webinar last month. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
Risk assessments would seemingly be about assessing risks, but they are not. [read post]