Search for: "SHARP v. UNITED STATES"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Instead, the court determined that it must apply the two-prong test announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:11 pm
The behavior of the United States government in this case is not one of them. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
But can those doctrinal departures and sharp caveats be taken at face value? [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 7:43 am
Sharp v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:15 pm
United States, (SD TX, filed 1/6/2009) seeks a declaratory judgment, injunction, reinstatement and back pay. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:18 am
Avianca, Inc., the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York sanctioned attorneys for citing to non-existent, fake cases generated by Open AI’s ChatGPT. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:03 pm
§ 1337(a)(3), a complainant must show that an industry in the United States exists with respect to the articles protected by the asserted patent in the form of:(A) significant investment in plant and equipment; (B) significant employment of labor or capital; or (C) substantial investment in its exploitation, including engineering, research and development, or licensing. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Others, a Chancery Division, England and Wales, ruling last week from Mr Justice Nugee [don't ask: the Kats haven't come across him either, but he is a Chancery judge], addressed an important preliminary issue. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm
Because the art market is opaque, diligence is needed to discover an object's true chain of custody, transfer, and ownership.The latest court case demonstrating the need for due diligence is United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 5:45 pm
" As reported in this later New York Times article, the United States government has already paid $300,000 to settle the claims of Iqbal's co-plaintiff. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:20 am
Beginning with the famous case of Bolling v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:20 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeImpersonation, Tax Evasion Sentence Upheld; 'Sharp Practice' Not Due Process Violation United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:16 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:01 am
Cyber Unit. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
See, e.g., Sharp v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Hodges (Ohio), Tanco v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:51 am
In Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 2:33 am
The “narrative” describes Lakhdar Boumediene and the four other Algerians, all of whom were captured in Bosnia, as being either members of the Al-Qaeda terrorist network or being associated with Al-Qaeda “and other suspected terrorists” in activities “against the United States and its allies. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
That reach has included (up until Kiobel II) Chinese corporations and Russian oligarchs, irrespective of any contacts with the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:35 am
Eden Alexander presents the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, United States v. [read post]
