Search for: "STANFORD V. STATE"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,152
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
It was not until 2017—more than two decades after United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 10:39 am
In Stanford v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:35 am
” The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this morning in Nestlé USA v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 11:00 am
Uncovering market practices in the “new knowledge” economy, Wang maps the everyday life of copyright and piracy in relation to the emerging modern state and "new knowledge. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:55 pm
Gore,” said Nathaniel Persily, a Stanford law professor and co-director of the Stanford-M.I.T. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm
United States U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am
If the Court wanted to go down the path of emphasizing subjective motivations, it would have decided Trump v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 5:36 pm
After nearly two hours of debate Wednesday in Fulton v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 12:57 pm
Thus, it has come as no surprise to me that my list differs, for example, from the list that the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse maintains on its website. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
They did so where the recount included some votes in the state and excluded others, a circumstance hardly likely to recur.Moreover, had there been an objection to the Florida electors presented to Congress, Bush v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 11:30 am
This series is part of Lawfare's collaboration with the Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am
This series is part of Lawfare's collaboration with the Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:45 am
In Middleton v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
This series is part of Lawfare's collaboration with the Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am
This series is part of Lawfare's collaboration with the Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am
This series is part of Lawfare's collaboration with the Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:39 am
While dozens of cases are still pending and new cases are being filed every week, the Purcell v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm
With respect to data security, there are few more useful and concise statements than the “Charney Theorem,” which states: “there’s always a percentage of the population up to no good. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:46 am
Lawfare is partnering with the Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project to produce a series on election integrity in the midst of the coronavirus crisis. [read post]
