Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2006, 3:59 pm
The following argument preview was written by Brian Love of the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 4:05 pm
In difference-in-difference analyses, affected states experience increases in both capital and labor income relative to unaffected states. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:44 am
Below, Stanford Law School’s Bryan Henderson recaps yesterday’s opinion in United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 12:34 pm
From an administrative law standpoint, this case is potentially significant because it could clarify the Court's demarcation in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 5:17 pm
By Eric Goldman We're anxiously awaiting oral arguments in the Rescuecom v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:54 pm
Stanford law professor Jeffrey L. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Once this system takes hold, it forms a true equilibrium from which only oddball states (Maine and Nebraska) will depart. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 9:30 pm
David Alan Sklansky, Stanford Law School, has posted The Neglected Origins of the Hearsay Rule in American Slavery: Recovering Queen v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 7:02 am
Cir. 2000) (stating that while the ownership of patent rights is typically a question exclusively for state courts, the question of whether contractual language effects a present assignment of patent rights, or an agreement to assign rights in the future, is resolved by Federal Circuit law); and Bd. of Trs. of Leland Stanford Junior Univ. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:23 am
Supreme Court case 'Eldred v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:20 am
It must be curricular-reform day at Prawfs, as Jeff kicks off with a discussion of Stanford's new model. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm
Finally, in light of the decision inBridgeman v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:40 pm
Elisabeth Oppenheimer is a recent graduate of Stanford Law School. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:10 pm
It first analyzes the likely outcomes of Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 4:01 pm
Below, Stanford Law School's Samantha Bateman previews Florida v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
Tasting the TM in Pepsi/Coke studies.What we know about brands v. what we know about TMs—Deven Desai has written about the distinction and the lack thereof that has been part of the problem. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 11:03 am
Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Cyan Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 11:45 am
The majority in Stanford v. [read post]
