Search for: "STATE v CLOSE"
Results 381 - 400
of 28,656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2010, 9:07 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:44 am
S. 276, 281 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:11 am
Here in the United States, many are finally seeing the light at the end of the COVID-19 tunnel. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:49 am
US and Arizona v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
Oral argument at CAAF in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
On July 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:45 am
IMAGE: The United States Capitol (via Getty Images) The post The House Closed a Key Loophole in Court-Martial Appeals; Will the Senate Follow? [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:15 am
In Ali v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:01 pm
In the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 1:52 am
When the costs of operating the Fund skyrocketed, the New York Legislature closed the Fund to future transfer applications. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:07 am
The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in the closely watched case of Risen v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm
Smith v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 9:22 pm
Here's the closing I expect:"Ladies and gentlemen, all of you have by now heard or read about this case. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:53 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
There will be other chances to convince other panels of the Court of Appeal that our view of Conte - and of the scope of products liability generally - ought to prevail.So with that in mind, we offer our closing arguments on Conte, for the good of the order. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 2:28 am
In STATE v. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 2:31 pm
See Sofie v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
Here, the possible prejudicial effect of the "were-they-lying" questions is demonstrated by the number and combination of the questions themselves, the repeated emphasis on them during the State's closing argument, and, most importantly, the jury's behavior during its deliberations. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am
Whilst the courts were slow to interfere in the executive’s assessment of whether there was a public emergency threatening the life of the nation in the Belmarsh case (A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 2 AC 68), and accorded the Secretary of State’s assessment “great weight”, it did actually perform a review of that assessment, albeit granting the executive a wide discretionary area of judgement. [read post]
