Search for: "STATE v PIERRE" Results 381 - 400 of 453
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2010, 8:04 am
The AmeriKat has been trying to ignore the "Tea Party" movement in the States because in her opinion it just calls attention to ill-informed and ignorant politics of the Bush era. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:29 am by Sonya Hubbard
” After that, every issue that Klein raises and the company rebuts takes on a “he said” v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:15 am by David Luban
Indeed, the colloquial "water torture" references in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:50 pm by cdw
  Adding to that, over the course of the last few weeks and for the next month, or so, I’ve been prepping and, starting next week, trying a fairly complex sexual assault case remanded for new trial by my state Supreme Court, State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am by Dave
In Henry and Mitchell v Henry [2010] UKPC 3, the Privy Council have given further consideration to the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am by Dave
In Henry and Mitchell v Henry [2010] UKPC 3, the Privy Council have given further consideration to the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 1:08 am
"Comments - Leduc Wetaskiwin Pipestone... - http://editors-comment.blogspot.com/   Road rage drivers beware – Constitutionally SpeakingBy Pierre De Vos "It is true that the crime of crimen injuria does exist in South African law. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:22 pm by Daithí
Pierre Legrand’s dissection of the Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (2007) 2 JCL 253 (sadly not online, but forwarded by a colleague, and worth reading if you can find it). [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 2:01 am
Pierre (4D08-2414),  a case involving a compromise jury verdict. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
Categreil, Implementing Human Rights in the NAFTA Regime - The Potential of a Pending Case: Glamis Corp v USAJ. [read post]