Search for: "STATE v. HASTINGS" Results 381 - 400 of 998
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm by Josh Blackman
“In their haste to reach the merits of the plaintiffs’ Establishment Clause claim,” he noted, “my colleagues in the majority neglect to follow the longstanding and well-defined requirements of Article III of the United States Constitution. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
Though you may have had some anxiety this past summer following the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The transfer decision in Heffernan is available here.For those wanting a deeper analytical dive into forum-selection clauses post-Atlantic Marine, please read Professor Stephen Sachs' article in the Hastings Law Journal.Defend Trade Secrets ActIn my second weekly column of the year, I alluded to the New Jersey case of Chubb INA Holdings v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm by Jamie Baker
Professor Loewy’s article Statutory Rape in a Post Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
Bayani (1990) 22 HLR 406, and Cramp v Hastings Borough Council [2005] H.L.R. 48. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Peep Beep has also examined the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgement in the joint cases C‑203/15 Tele2 Sverige AB v Postoch telestyrelsen and C‑698/15 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]