Search for: "STATE v. STEVENS"
Results 381 - 400
of 7,801
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
United States) and the other (Bolling v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP v. [read post]
Constructive Ambiguity of the Budapest Memorandum at 28: Making Sense of the Controversial Agreement
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
Additionally, Ukrainian and U.S. negotiators Borys Tarasyuk and Steven Pifer recalled that in the discussions about the Budapest Memorandum, U.S. negotiators promised orally that the United States would take a strong interest and respond to any Russian violations of the agreement or the “memorandum’s spirit. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
The SEC’s Office of Economic Analysis’ 2009 Study on Section 404 states this point more explicitly: “Section 13(b)(2) of the Exchange Act requires companies to maintain effective ICFR, while Section 404 requires management to report on the effectiveness of ICFR. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm
Partakis-Stevens & Anor v Sihan & Ors (2022) EWHC 3249 (TCC) – Nuisance claim for water run-off from adjoining garden after landscaping works. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
In Biden v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:27 pm
Camp was quoted in the following article: Steven H. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
Hogan v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
Grutter v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
But 4 justices agreed with Justice Brennan that knowledge of your product ending up in the forum state -- which virtually certainly existed here -- was good enough even without the "additional conduct" listed by O'Connor, and Justice Steven says that knowledge plus a certain number of continuous sales gets his vote too, resulting (as there) in a majority on that score. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
State equality in the Senate constrains persons who believe in representation by population, configures politics by enabling low population states to receive far more than their fair share of federal funds, and constitutes politics when people assume that equal state representation is a natural feature of governance in the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
In state courts, gatekeeping is a very uneven process. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:45 pm
Martin Luther King, Jr. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:04 am
From Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:01 am
Supreme Court ruled in McLaurin v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:55 am
” Justice Stevens offered a more limited dissent in calling for a remand to consider the study further. [read post]
