Search for: "STATE v. UNITED STATES" Results 381 - 400 of 102,779
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by Timothy D. Lytton
The problem has become so bad that contaminated fruits and vegetables are now the leading cause of foodborne illness in the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
SDNY Judge Holds SEC Failed to Adequately Plead Risk Disclosure and Controls Claims in SolarWinds On July 18, 2024, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an opinion in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 8:26 am by Reference Staff
Also known as the Johnson-Reed Act, the law replaced and expanded on the temporary Emergency Quota Act of 1921, which for the first time placed annual caps on the number of immigrants admitted to the United States and set a national origins quota system for newly arriving immigrants.U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 7:26 am by Chukwuma Okoli
In a recent United Kingdom Supreme Court case in FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Lady Brownlie, Lord Leggatt (with whom the other members of the Court all agreed) at paragraph 148 held that: “[T]he old notion that foreign legal materials can only ever be brought before the court as part of the evidence of an expert witness is outdated. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 7:01 am by Katitza Rodriguez
The United Nations Convention on Cybercrime, even before negotiations began, raised significant alarm within the global human rights community. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 3:18 pm by centerforartlaw
Landmark Copyright case: Thaler v Perlmutter[3] (For an in-depth case review of Thaler v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 12:15 pm by Stuart Benjamin
Hartlage, the United States Supreme Court confronted a state statute very similar to § 599. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 12:01 pm by Paul Caron
United States, finally resolved a conflict over the proper deference standard for tax regulations. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 11:21 am by Ben Sperry
Strict scrutiny is warranted because the DPIA report requirement… deputizes private actors into censoring speech based on its content, see United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 10:05 am by Eugene Volokh
That there exist Russian expatriates in the United States who support Putin does not compel a finding that the February 27 Policy facially discriminates against them. [read post]