Search for: "STATE v. VIGIL" Results 381 - 400 of 1,231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 5:21 am by 1 Crown Office Row
In finding the measures to be proportionate, the Court distinguished the case of Tabernacle v Secretary of State for Defence in which the Court quashed a byelaw preventing camping next to the Aldermaston nuclear site. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 5:28 pm
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:45 am by Heather Wallace
In a victory for California businesses, the 2nd District Court of Appeal has ruled in an unpublished opinion that on-call rest periods are lawful. 2nd Appellate Court Ruling In Jennifer Augustus, et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:00 am by LTA-Editor
This case highlights the importance of vigilant patent monitoring. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Otherwise, in circumstances where the court considers a contracting State obliged to use all available means to combat racism (see, for example, Nachova v Bulgaria [2006] 42 EHRR 43 where the ECtHR identified race discrimination as “a particularly invidious kind of discrimination” requiring special vigilance from the authorities and a vigorous reaction), a State which actually causes racism through its legislation would not be covered by the… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:04 am
Although the taxing power may not be used to impose “punishment for an unlawful act,” United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:20 am by Brian Evans
Virginia, 2002) and for juvenile offenders (Roper v. [read post]