Search for: "STEVENS V US" Results 381 - 400 of 6,738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2008, 6:44 am
Over the objections of Justices Stevens and Breyer, the Supreme Court has denied cert in Kelly v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
This blog post mentioned that Alameda County Superior Court Judge Steven A. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:28 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the opinion: Stevens v Ark Dept of Human Services An excerpt: Even though the child’s father had not produced the ordered evidence of eligibility for Choctaw membership, the trial court utilized the higher evidentiary standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, which is required under the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 2:08 pm
Justice Stevens issued a statement respecting the denial of certiorari in Walker v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:47 pm
  The Court hasn’t opined on this subject since the 1991 case of Payne v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 5:17 pm
Thus spake Justice Stevens, concurring in yesterday's decision in New York State Bd. of Elections v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 5:36 pm
Tony Mauro of Legal Times has a post that begins:Supreme Court: Scalia and Stevens Duke It Out It was an extraordinary 23-minute-long scene at the Supreme Court this morning as Justice Antonin Scalia read from his majority opinion in D.C. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 11:29 am by Orin Kerr
For those of us worried about broad readings of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the decision is quite troubling. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:55 pm by Zoe Tillman
” On appeal, attorneys for the three men argued that prosecutors failed to turn over information on Terry’s drug use the day before she was shot as soon as they found out about it, in violation of Brady v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:31 am by Eugene Volokh
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm by carie
And for a time, his votes fit a moderately conservative pattern, though he often struck out on his own in the legal reasoning he used to get to a result. [read post]