Search for: "STONE v. HOPE" Results 381 - 400 of 420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am by David Pocklington
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during October 2023  The seven consistory court judgments circulated in October relate to Reordering, extensions and other building works, Church Treasures/Sale of Paintings/Loans/Memorials, and Churchyards and burials. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:34 am by Paul Horwitz
 Of course, the starting point for many con law classes is Marbury v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
And my hope is that, through that discussion, thinkers and policymakers may come closer to a consensus than they have before. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This is bound up with rules v. standards. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm by Christopher Fonzone
Perhaps most importantly, maligning the process doesn’t require solving what are almost always nearly intractable challenges; rather, it allows you to hold out hope that solutions will magically emerge from a “better” way of doing things. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am by Bob Ambrogi
As reported by Cheryl Miller in The Recorder, Assemblyman Mark Stone, D-Scotts Valley, and Sen. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am by Bob Ambrogi
As reported by Cheryl Miller in The Recorder, Assemblyman Mark Stone, D-Scotts Valley, and Sen. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
In Iran, the law prescribes that "In the punishment of stoning to death, the stones should not be so large that the person dies on being hit by one or two of them, nor should they be so small that they could not be defined as stones. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Those were all situations in which Republicans should have said, “OK, this is finally too much,” but they never did.All of these examples and more demonstrate that we are not waiting for Trump to change but are instead simply enabling Republicans to run the clock and let people become accustomed to Trump’s new assault on decency and the rule of law.And we should not forget that none of the public statements by Republicans thus far is set in stone. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:17 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
Finalizing tokens offered in program – as previously discussed, the total amount of tokens sold through the offering is not set in stone. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:28 am by Larry Downes
Part V will review the legal basis on which the majority rests its authority for the rules, likely to be challenged in court. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm by Ken
It has been brought to our attention that you have content on your websites http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2011/11/the-false-hope-of-the-burzynski-clinic.html that is in violation of multiple laws. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:31 pm
  I have been writing about the fundamental shift in the focus of human rights and human rights discourse, from one framed in the discursive tropes of liberal democratic ideology to one framed in an emerging Marxist-Leninist discourse (Backer, Larry Catá, ‘By Dred Things I am Compelled’: China and the Challenge to International Human Rights Law and Policy (January 15, 2020). [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm by Josh Blackman
Second, Biskupic explains that the precise details of the majority were not set in stone. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:49 am
Box 308 Faribault, MN 55021-0308 Phone: (507) 332-5491 (V/TTY); (800) 657-3936 (V/TTY/Toll Free) DEAF, Inc. 413 Wacouta Street Suite 300 St. [read post]