Search for: "STONE v. HOPE"
Results 381 - 400
of 420
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2008, 4:15 pm
" Activists think they have the needed support, but Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 4:34 am
By way of example, there is already OHIM case law relating to designs used on toy cars as opposed to real cars (Supermarked A/S v Ferrari SPA, ICD 842, 13 November 2006), as well as a decision of the Court of Appeal of England & Wales relating to a design that can function as both a laundry aid, and a massage device (Green Lane Products Ltd v PMS International Group Plc & Ors [2008] EWCA 358). [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
Obama has shown restraint in not raising the issue of McCain's associations with discreditable types through service on boards, which are detailed in the Rolling Stone profile that's been making its way around the internet, but the Obama campaign has come up with its own personal attack "talking points" that oversimplify or distort. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
They take the position that all prescription medical products are "unavoidably unsafe," because (1) the FDA's approved them, and (2) the existence of inherent risks is why prescription products require prescriptions in the first place:Alabama: Stone v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:26 pm
I hope that makes it more popular. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 7:01 pm
The recent New York Supreme Court decision in Ottinger v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Ryan I certainly set out the correct standard, per Stone v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 5:59 pm
V. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Insurance 3 Ben Silver Fuel Outdoor Acquisitions 3 Alex Yaroslavsky Yaro Group, LLC Mediator 3 David Cassese Apex Appraisal Group Appraisal - Residential 2 Paul Wong Concept Realty NY Commercial Broker 1 Sherri Fried RED STONE TITLE & ABSTRACT, LLC Title Insurance 3 AARON KAGAN STUYVESANT HEIGHTS PROPERTIES LLC INVESTOR/OWNER 2 Franklin Burrowes OODA & Co, Inc Investor / Owner 3 Ronald Gold Gold Appraisal Appraiser 2 Lisa… [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:31 pm
Lets hope Shami Chakrabati gets Liberty involved. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 4:37 pm
It is unfortunate that there is no set in stone method of determining what constitutes a "minor" and what is legal. [read post]
7 May 2008, 5:10 am
The dishonesty or self-deception of the Bush v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:38 am
Wegner also writes --In other words, if S. 1145 is enacted in the manner hoped for by the PTO, then S. 1145 would legislatively overrule today's Tafas v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
I was influenced by many things in my youth - Zappa, Captain Beefheart, The Stones, The Doors. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 8:23 am
These claims documents, the value of which appears to be some mixture of hype and hope, were used by Scruggs in a variety of sensationalism ways to drum up publicity and to use as leverage -- the Rigsby sisters' 20/20 interview, numerous uncritical press stories featuring Scruggs' exaggerations, the False Claims Act case, several Katrina cases including McIntosh v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 1:30 am
Certain fringe groups hope to change this by passing anti-bullying legislation (see Sticks and stones may break my bones...). [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:41 am
Being stoned to death is just a degree of pain for a murderer anyway. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 3:54 pm
This makes me wonder whether I can really distinguish between 300 and 600 count sheets; 65 v. 70% cacao, cabernet v. cabernet sauvignon, and other pretentions I've gained since going to law school and becoming a yuppie Ivory Tower intellectual. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:30 am
Referring to a Caremark claim as “possibly the most difficult theory in corporation law upon which a plaintiff may hope to win a judgment”, the Chancery Court cited to the recent Delaware Supreme Court decision confirming the Caremark analysis, in Stone v. [read post]
