Search for: "SWEAT v. SWEAT" Results 381 - 400 of 637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2012, 5:21 am
On the other hand, can anyone claim originality in a V-shaped graph; any graph? [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:36 am by John L. Welch
., Serial No. 77219184 [Refusal to register the mark depicted below, consisted of "the configuration of interlaced woven strips of leather forming a repeating weave pattern used over all or substantially all of the goods," for wallets, purses, and other leather goods, on the grounds of aesthetic and utilitarian functionality, mere ornamentality, and lack of acquired distinctiveness].October 5, 2011 - 2 PM: Companhia de Bebidas das Americas v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the recent case (Majchrzak v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:25 am by Randy Barnett
 They are now “preparing the battlefield” to characterize an adverse decision as unprincipled and “political,” just the way they did before the decision in Bush v. [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 6:17 pm
 . conclusions" of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:26 am by Susan Brenner
The officer immediately noticed that Newman was sweating and wearing a black stocking cap. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 1:45 pm
Progress, however, has been interrupted.In 2013, the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:34 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
” That does not mean that mere “sweat of the brow” is enough to claim protection of a compilation by copyright, as explained by the Supreme Court in Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 2:05 am by Sally Peat
It was the hottest night of the year so far and even the Egyptian mummies were sweating. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:00 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> DE Department of Natural Res. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 11:02 am by Johanna Silver
It also fulfills an urgent need, as Louisiana law bars civil rights challenges after one year following the incident, and the Supreme Court case Heck v. [read post]