Search for: "San Jose California Supreme Court"
Results 381 - 400
of 659
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2012, 6:52 pm
" See the California Supreme Court case People v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 10:53 am
" Howard Mintz of The San Jose Mercury News has an update headlined "Proposition 8 case headed to U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
Guardian, CBS News, the San Francisco Chronicle, the San Jose Mercury, the Maddow Blog, the Los Angeles Times, Reuters, the Boston Herald, the Washington Times, the (U.K.) [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:27 pm
Superior Court of San Diego County. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:54 pm
Supreme court previously rejected an appeal in another San Jose case from a 2009 state Supreme Court ruling that reached the same conclusion. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:43 am
A federal judge in San Francisco, District Judge Jeffrey S. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:32 pm
Judge James Ware has had a notable career as a lawyer and judge here in the San Jose and greater San Francisco Bay Area. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:38 pm
Sulla's attorney said that they will appeal to the California Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 4:12 pm
" See the California Supreme Court case People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm
The highest-profile U.S. citizen taken captive as a suspected terrorist — Jose Padilla — returned to the Supreme Court on Monday, in a bid to get the federal courts to review the government’s power to wage its “war on terrorism” through prolonged detention inside the U.S., under harsh conditions and without criminal charges. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
") "Workers' class action against Brinker can proceed, in part" (Reuters) "California employers must give workers breaks, court rules" (Bloomberg) "California employers must provide meal breaks, court says" (Wall Street Journal Law Blog) "State high court rules workers get half-hour break" (San Francisco Chronicle) "Restaurants must give employees breaks every five hours, state… [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 6:17 pm
Campbell's lawyers say that will appeal to the California Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:32 am
Hard copies of the opinion are available in the Supreme Court’s Clerk’s Office, 350 McAllister Street, San Francisco. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
Both Connerly and ACRI were permitted by the district court to intervene in the present case and were represented by the Pacific Legal Foundation, a conservative/libertarian public interest litigation firm that has successfully represented proponents of Section 31 in other cases, including Coral Constr, Inc v City & County of San Francisco (CalSCt (2010); 93 EPD ¶43,961) and Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc v City of San Jose (CalSCt (2000); 76 EPD… [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am
San Jose, 485 U. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:05 pm
You can recount by heart the story of the rise and fall of the alternative voluntary redevelopment program that was ABx1 27 and the Supreme Court’s decision in California Redevelopment Assn v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:15 am
" ACLU Releases Report on Realignment: Tracey Kaplan of San Jose Mercury News reports the ACLU of Northern California released a new report Tuesday reviewing the implementation of realignment. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 11:53 am
San Jose, January 24, 2012). [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:01 am
The reason for that prediction is the Supreme Court's crackdown on the Ninth Circuit last term in three important decisions: Walker v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
In other news, sponsors of California’s ban on same-sex marriage have asked the Ninth Circuit to reconsider the case en banc – a move that would vacate the panel ruling and delay the case’s potential arrival at the Supreme Court. [read post]
