Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 4,620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am by The Federalist Society
 Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justice Kennedy, and by Justice Scalia in all except Parts III and V–B–1.To discuss the case, we have Kristen Osenga, who is a Professor of Law at the University of Richmond School of Law. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am by The Federalist Society
 Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justice Kennedy, and by Justice Scalia in all except Parts III and V–B–1.To discuss the case, we have Kristen Osenga, who is a Professor of Law at the University of Richmond School of Law. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:00 pm
Here are some highlights:1) When asked whether part of his job is to safeguard the image of the United States overseas, Justice Scalia answers yes, and that he does so by traveling around the world as a good will ambassador. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:21 am
Justice Scalia concludes that the narrow holding of the case is, therefore, "that ‘proceeds' means ‘profits' when there is no legislative history to the contrary. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:06 am
The decision below, which held for the United States, is vacated and remanded, in an 7-2 opinion by Chief Justice Roberts, available here. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:58 pm
United States, and on Wednesday, April 29, it announced its decision in Kansas v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:39 am
On March 24, 2015, the United States Supreme Court issued its Opinion in Omnicare, Inc., Et Al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:57 am by Lovechilde
Gore was one of the most shameful episodes in the history of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:24 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Yes, said all 9 Justices of the Supreme Court today in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
United States where a majority of the Supreme Court ruled Arizona's controversial Immigration law a\k\a SB1070 as unconstitutional. [read post]