Search for: "Scott v. King*"
Results 381 - 400
of 639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2006, 1:26 am
Cummings Fordham International Law Journal, Volume 29, Number 4, April 2006 Philip V. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:34 pm
200 years of slavery, the Civil War, poll taxes and Jim Crow laws, the Dred Scott, Plessy v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 9:03 am
I discussed State of Maine v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm
Legal Context To the Framers of the Constitution, the king’s appointment power was “the most insidious and powerful weapon of eighteenth century despotism,” one that the king used to appoint “‘miniature infinitesimal Deities’” to spread the “weeds of tyranny” across the colonies. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
Another favorite was BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:58 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 4:10 pm
In Steel v United Kingdom ((2005) 41 EHRR 22) the Court found violations of Article 6 and Article 10 ECHR. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The action names as defendants the city of Kingston and four of its policemen: Sergeant Maisenhelder, Officers William Hadsel, Scott Williams and Harry Woltman. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
One such Dred Scott case was the result of a bench trial in a federal district court in Atlanta, in Wells v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
Chris Amann has filed a defamation claim against CM Punk (Phil Brooks) and Colt Cabana (Scott Colton) for comments that were made on “The Art of Wrestling” podcast. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares patent search… [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 1:23 pm
Amendment VI, as interpreted in, among other cases, Scott v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm
Scotland Scottish Legal News had a piece “Scott Clair: Scots law of defamation and putting a kilt on Rebekah Vardy”. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Scott Paper Co. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP) Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office) PricewaterhouseCooper report… [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Science, Scholarship, and Policymaking Scott Burris, Temple University, Science, Interdisciplinarity, and Health Law Scholarship Kevin Outterson, Boston University, Bad Science Leads to Bad Legal Scholarship Joanna Sax, California Western School of Law, Consumer Perceptions of Risk in Various Areas of Biotechnology C. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm
German princes wrote to King George V, offering to substitute themselves for the kaiser. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit just handed down an interesting and important right-of-publicity decision, in Rosa & Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:10 am
According to Sedley LJ (with whom Sir Scott Baker agreed), the rule had “passed beyond redemption by the courts” [27] and was “anomalous, frequently otiose and, where not otiose, unjust” [31]. [read post]
