Search for: "Sealed Defendant 6" Results 381 - 400 of 887
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2017, 6:19 pm by Brian Shiffrin
 Our conclusion that a defendant's opportunity to participate in suppression proceedings must yield in some cases to the need for confidentiality is not intended to suggest that courts may routinely grant the People's application to seal the record. [read post]
30 May 2017, 6:00 am by Benjamin Herbst
Prior coordinated law enforcement operations on the Eastern Shore have benefitted from the use of wiretap warrants, which could have sealed the fate of the defendants in this case. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:03 pm by Robert E. Connolly
”[6]  Giving a foreign fugitive defendant some access to a U.S. court will strengthen the government’s hand when trying to extradite that individual. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Guess case, and horrible survey accepted by court as evidence even w/net 6% confusion. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 12:00 am
Ulbricht was sentenced to life in prison, although his sentence is currently on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.[6] The taint of Bitcoin’s use as part of a broader criminal enterprise has chilled many from exploring further the use of the cryptocurrencies for law-abiding means. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:00 pm
Ulbricht was sentenced to life in prison, although his sentence is currently on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.[6] The taint of Bitcoin’s use as part of a broader criminal enterprise has chilled many from exploring further the use of the cryptocurrencies for law-abiding means. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am by Dennis Crouch
Sarnoff, Derivation and Prior Art Problems with the New Patent Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 12 (sarnoff.2011.derivation.pdf) Bernard Chao, Not So Confidential: A Call for Restraint in Sealing Court Records, 2011 Patently-O Patent Patent Law Journal 6 (chao.sealedrecords.pdf) Benjamin Levi and Rodney R. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:26 pm by Bill Marler
In addition, FoodNet conducts active laboratory- and population-based surveillance. [7] In 2006, public health officials from 48 states reported 1,270 foodborne disease outbreaks, with a confirmed or suspect source in 884 of the outbreaks (70%). [8] Only one of the outbreaks with a confirmed source was attributed to Listeria, with this outbreak involving eleven hospitalizations and one death. [8] The next year, of 17,883 lab-confirmed infections, the CDC attributed 122 to Listeria. [9] In 2009,… [read post]
Dec. 6, 2016), the federal district court for the district of Massachusetts denied a defendant employee’s motion to dismiss and held that a defendant must present evidence to justify the whistleblower immunity. [read post]
Dec. 6, 2016), the federal district court for the district of Massachusetts denied a defendant employee’s motion to dismiss and held that a defendant must present evidence to justify the whistleblower immunity. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm by Kevin LaCroix
According to the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ January 3, 2016 press release (here), the complaint (a copy of which can be found here), alleges that the defendants:   made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Endologix did not have the requisite clinical data for FDA premarket approval of its Nellix® EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing System; and (2) as a result, Endologix’s public statements were materially false and misleading at… [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:42 pm by Mark L. Earley
First, it means that defendants cannot count on a dismissal if a relator violates the seal provision. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 9:30 am by Jamie Baker
Miller, 12 West’s Legal Forms, Commercial Transactions 6:39 (2016). [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Alexander Barthet
Indemnification clauses in prime contracts and subcontracts are customary and also provide justification for such defenses or claims. 6. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 7:32 am by Bob Farb
The court set out these factors in its opinion, which included: (1) size and shape of mailing; (2) package taped to seal all openings; (3) handwritten mailing label; (4) fictitious return address; (5) unusual odors from package; (6) city of origin being a common drug source; and (7) repeated mailings from same sender and addresses. [read post]