Search for: "Security-First National Bank v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 1,234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2019, 5:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
National Australia Bank Ltd. in many ways set the stage for the more recent developments. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
United States The Federal Trade Commission voted to approve a fine of roughly [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
United States The Judge has reduced the damages in the Oberlin college libel case from $44m to $25m to comply with various limits laid down in Ohio law. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Naked Security had a post on the new Mozilla’s online project called Track THIS. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am by Russell Spivak, Benjamin Wittes
In other words, at least in some of these cases, the question is less whether Russia is behaving itself than whether the United States wants its laws subject to exploitation by adversary nations. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 8:18 am
Departing from the United States Supreme Court’s 2010 opinion in Morrison v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:19 pm by Scott R. Anderson, Kathleen Claussen
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—ultimately ruled in his favor in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 11:33 am by David Greene
Under the language of the statute, this includes literally “anything connected with the national defense,” so long as there is an  “intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation. [read post]
These developments impact many SaaS providers, especially due to the expanded nexus provisions that many states are enacting after the United States Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:46 am by Matthew Rizzolo
College Savings Bank, 527 U.S. 627, 642(1999) [2] See, e.g., Horne v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Under this agreement, the United States was obligated to terminate all legal proceedings in U.S. courts involving claims of United States nationals against Iran, to nullify all attachments and judgments obtained therein, and to bring about the termination of such claims through binding arbitration in an Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Justin Hemmings, Nathan Swire
The directive states that,         The collection of foreign private commercial information or trade secrets is authorized only to protect the national security of the United States or its partners and allies. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
On March 30th, Professor Victoria Sutton gave a presentation entitled Designer Babies and National Security at Stanford Law’s annual “Biolawlapalooza” Conference. [read post]