Search for: "Self v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 15,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2013, 6:22 am by Joy Waltemath
Discharged for violating his employer’s conduct policy against the use of “abusive or threatening language,” a quality control inspector was unable to convince the New Hampshire Supreme Court that there was a jury issue as to whether state public policy supporting “self-defense” made his discharge wrongful (Leeds v BAE Systems, November 5, 2013, Hicks, G). [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 1:33 pm
 LCB:  Aaaaah, Betita, but it is to the integrity of that state of being alone, in one's own company, that oneness with oneself that is opf the self and not a reflection of the aggregate others projected into the self that is the stuff of great challenge. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
 Yesterday saw five of the most conservative of the Supreme Court justices refusing to require a state court system (in Texas) to let an International Court of Justice ruling cause Texas to deviate from its law that does not permit more than one state-level habeas corpus proceeding. blank">Medellin v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 5:01 am
The Court noted that such cases were distinguishable from the case at hand, since most involved hearings to determine whether an indigent defendant was entitled to payment by the state for expert psychiatric testimony, but did not decide the issue, since the case at hand was resolved on other grounds.To be appealable, an order or judgment must ordinarily be final. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:36 am
Certain elements of the Bush Doctrine, like its claim to both pre-emptive self-defence and self-defence against states who harbour terrorists, stretch far beyond the traditional scope of the right to self-defence. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Preamble to the Regulations states that a self-insured plan sponsor must pay the fee with respect to arrangements where the plan design layers a self-insured portion of the plan with an insured portion, even though the insurer also must pay the fee with respect to the insured portion. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 10:40 pm by KLIBlogsAdmin
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-2215, 25 July 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Robert Klasfeld
Significantly, the Supreme Court has held that states can invoke such authority—within reason—to respond to a health crisis.In 1905, writing for the 7-2 majority in Jacobson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]