Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 3,983
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2022, 2:26 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:28 am
The case (Matal v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 3:37 pm
(See Sellers, supra, 73 Cal.App.5th at p. 460; Salamone v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:19 am
Such violations included: Failing to reduce APRs to the appropriate level because the creditors could not identify the lowest rate applicable to the acquired accounts due to their failure to obtain this data from the seller at the time of acquisition. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:05 am
” Becker v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:54 am
In another 5-4 decision from Justice Kennedy, the court said sellers who engage in significant business within a state may be required to pay taxes, even if the business does not have a physical presence in the taxing state. [read post]
2 May 2022, 12:36 pm
Consumer disputes that arise between a consumer and a seller, including claims by a third party involved in the transaction. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:43 am
Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 5:51 am
., LLC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
M/V Arica, Civil Action No. 20-679-RGA, 2022 U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 1:39 pm
The complaint alleges that in the Offering Documents and in statements during the class period, the defendants made false or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company had defective financial controls; (ii) as a result, there were errors in the Company’s financial statements related to the misclassification of certain shares issued prior to the Business Combination; (iii) accordingly, the Company would need to restate certain of its financial statements; (iv)… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:32 am
Structural Plywood Integrity Coalition v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:51 am
From Sida v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 3:58 am
It is thus insufficient to state a claim for legal malpractice. [read post]
CFPB files lawsuit against TransUnion and former executive alleging violations of 2017 consent order
20 Apr 2022, 11:11 am
” TransUnion stated further: We have been in compliance with our obligations and we remain in compliance with the consent order today. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
" And she is spot-on that the case law on tying suggests Section 1 even applies when a seller exploits its control over a product and "[t]he buyer plays no role beyond purchasing the goods under conditions set by the seller. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am
Sellers v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am
The Supreme Court’s determination that Howard Fensterman’s conduct during the settlement of the New Franklin litigation “was simply a product of his conflict of interest in representing both buyers and sellers in the New Franklin and Fort Tyron transactions” is a premature factual finding inappropriate at this stage of the litigation (see Warney v State of New York, 16 NY3d 428, 436-437; Matter of Gerard P. v Paula P., 186 AD3d 934,… [read post]
