Search for: "Settle v. State of California"
Results 381 - 400
of 3,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2008, 7:22 pm
State of California (November 20, 2008) ___ Cal. 4th ____, S143710 that the bright line Graham limitation -- no fees without a prelitigation effort to settle -- applies only to catalyst cases, not cases where the plaintiff obtains a judgment. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:52 am
Louis Vuitton denies the allegations, but decided to settle the class action lawsuit, entitled Deanna Morey v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm
Geneva Pharms., Inc., 344 F.3d 1294 (11th Cir. 2003) and Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 4:08 am
This morning's Supreme Court order list indicates that Samsung's petition for writ of certiorari (request for Supreme Court review) in the second California Apple v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:39 pm
Background In March 2018, the United States Supreme Court held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 12:24 pm
Arizona Settles with Google: In very recent news, on October 4, 2022 Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich settled a 2020 lawsuit he brought against Google over its mobile geolocation tracking. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
The justices did not settle on some sort of Solomonic split: for example, holding that the government could deny entry to aliens with non-immigrant visas but must admit aliens with immigrant visas. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 9:40 am
District Court for the Eastern District of California entered judgment in Coalition for a Sustainable Delta and Kern County Water Agency v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 9:28 am
On July 15, 2021, the California Supreme Court issued a decision in Ferra v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day Hughes v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day Hughes v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:45 pm
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, pending in United States District Court, Central District of California, Case No. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 9:05 pm
At least since 1958’s NAACP v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
California State Lands Commission, et al (San Francisco Waterfront Partners II, LLC, et al) (1st Dist., Div. 4, 2015) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2015 WL 5450294. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 7:33 am
In Coalition for a Sustainable Future in Yucaipa v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:03 am
Supreme Court (1) has consistently held that federal antitrust law does not displace state antitrust law (see, for example, California v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 5:01 pm
State Farm, 66 Cal. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:41 pm
In Chindarah v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:44 pm
Baasiri 23-568Issue: Whether a defendant’s status as an instrumentality of a foreign state under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
