Search for: "Sharp v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 2,834
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
  He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and  25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P,  Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Wright v McCormack, heard 16 and 18 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Ansari v Amini, heard 10-11 November 2020 (Julian Knowles J) Please let us know if there are other reserved judgments which we should be listing. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:10 pm by Christiana Wayne
Rohini Kurup explained the background and procedural history of Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 6:19 am by Florian Mueller
But that doesn't have to prevent the parties from engaging in constructive dialog, or multilateral talks that would also involve the United States and the United Kingdom.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am by Vercammen Law
The court found that Michael's opinion was contradicted by decedent's medical records and the testimony of her physician, who stated that decedent was in full control of her faculties during an examination on the day that she executed the 2015 Will. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
  Regents and the Role of Reasoned Decisionmaking in Termination of Programs In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:40 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Perhaps it’s stating the obvious, but it can’t hurt to have reminders of this. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
In sharp contrast to the Court’s ruling on the CDC’s moratorium, the Court in Trump v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 4:22 am by SHG
As the Supreme Court of Canada very recently noted, since R. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 2:19 pm by Steve Lubet
The Court’s unsigned opinion in Chrysafis v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Tompkins that federal courts must apply state law in diversity cases as opposed to the Swift v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 8:55 am by Patricia Hughes
Justice Sharpe refers to La Forest J. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:21 am by Florian Mueller
" (emphasis added)Hey, that's the same Apple that has been telling state legislatures in Arizona and many other states that they shouldn't legislate on mobile app stores (and I guess Apple is not exactly a fan of right-to-repair state laws either). [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Lawrence Sanders, State University of New York at Buffalo. [read post]