Search for: "Sharpe v. Department of Justice"
Results 381 - 400
of 515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Last week, a Manhattan appellate panel in Antonini v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm
If the asylum officer makes a positive finding, the claimant gets a full hearing before a Department of Justice immigration judge. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:47 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Financial Oversight and Management Bd. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Hall notes that under the test Justice Gorsuch articulates in his Gundy v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 11:21 am
Consider this brief exchange between Justice Department Tax Division lawyer Gilbert Rothenberg and the panel: Panel: That’s how many years? [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
Contemporary observers noted the sharp contrast in the appearance and delivery of the speakers. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
The Claimant indicated that if the EAT did not anonymise the judgement in her holiday pay claim she would drop the proceedings, and submitted that elevating the principle of open justice over her right to privacy would impede her access to justice. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:17 am
Department of Justice. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 2:58 am
With Webber Wentzel’s pro bono department, he acted for the defendants in the Mineral Sands case and he also acts for the amici applicants in the Karyn Maughan case. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 1:31 pm
"] From a Kansas Supreme Court majority opinion (by Justice Stegall) earlier this month in State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:39 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:22 am
Officer Robert Chavez of the Deming Police Department sought the search warrant. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
[54] New Classic Cases – Falstaff The new Guidelines cite U.S. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am
Department of Justice, which complained the release could make it easier to launder money, including for terrorism, and discourage cooperation with law enforcement. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm
Agency for International Development v. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 5:54 am
As the Supreme Court’s opinion last term in Trump v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
They encourage dishonest and sharp practices by business. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
Surveillance The Home Office has said that it is preparing to accept a ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union from December which challenged the legality of the Investigatory Powers Act. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm
” Data Privacy and Data Protection The Court of Appeal has handed down its judgment in R (Open Rights Group and the3million) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others [2021] EWCA Civ 800 concluding that the ‘immigration exemption’ in Schedule 2 to the DPA 2018 is not compliant with the GDPR. [read post]
