Search for: "Sharpe v. Department of Justice"
Results 381 - 400
of 515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
Sharp law students understand Wickard v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm
Faced with those rejections, the Justice Department abandoned the argument as the cases moved up on appeals to the Circuit Courts. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:48 pm
Silberman, has criticized the Justice Department for not pressing for an even more permissive view of detention authority and has expressed doubt that any of his colleagues would vote to release any detainee without virtually absolute proof that they do not actively support a terrorist group. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:20 pm
First, in DeJohn v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:18 pm
First, in DeJohn v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:02 am
Early on, the Department of Justice issued a memorandum supporting the appointments stating that a president can make recess appointments when lawmakers hold pro forma sessions without conducting business. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:57 am
Why is it alright for Australians to insult Americans: Well, while it is true that convicted felons surrender many constitutional rights, they still retain certain rudimentary privileges. is a police allow to record you on the phone: little known fact: due to overuse of allergy medication, that is verbatim how Justice Stewart defined the issue presented in Katz v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:26 am
bit.ly/yNE968 (Robert Hilson) Improving Collaboration Between Inside and Outside Counsel in E-Discovery - bit.ly/yMgmik (@eDiscoveryBeat) In Civil Litigation, 'Private' Social Media Data Isn't Private - bit.ly/zN4TEq (Aaron Crews) In 'U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm
Sharp v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
Justice Department or from a special three-judge District Court in the nation’s capital. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
The Obama Administration interpretation of the AUMF The Department of Justice’s March 13, 2009 habeas brief argued that “[t]he detention authority conferred by the AUMF is necessarily informed by principles of the laws of war,” citing the governing opinion in Hamdi. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
The Obama Administration interpretation of the AUMF The Department of Justice’s March 13, 2009 habeas brief argued that “[t]he detention authority conferred by the AUMF is necessarily informed by principles of the laws of war,” citing the governing opinion in Hamdi. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre Vs. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Garcia-Udall v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Garcia-Udall v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
An appellate court decision issued last week in Lehey v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm
Me. 2008); Alabama v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:28 am
AO & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] E… Admin Court: Discretionary leave policy for Foreign National Prisoners breaches the no-fettering principle. [read post]
