Search for: "Shepherd v. State"
Results 381 - 397
of 397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2011, 7:52 am
2011 WL 5008008, at *3.There’s also Stevens v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Fox News v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:26 am
When the facts are as unfavorable to the taxpayer as they were in Estate of Malkin v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:05 am
Another involved nudity and a German Shepherd dog. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:11 am
Consequently, leaving polemics aside, the text requires an effort to reflect serenely, with the heart of shepherds, free from all ideology. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
The short summary I prepared fleshes out the themes I hope to cover: Regulatory governance is well within a process of transformation from a managerial system deeply embedded in the classical model of the rule-of-law state grounded in positive (or customary) law pronounced by an authoritative body clothed in the legislative power, to the world of the panopticon and the disciplines. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm
(discussing the doctrine of foreign equivalents in the context of denying registration for geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks); see also Palm Bay Imports v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 2:52 pm
Callow Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:42 am
LEARN IT, LIVE IT, LOVE IT SECURITIZATION The History of Financial Regulation in the United States What is Securitization? [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am
id=a5cdb7a6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2014] CSOH 169 CA73/13OPINION OF LORD DOHERTY In the cause (FIRST) A LIMITED (SECOND) B LIMITED (THIRD) C LIMITED (FOURTH) D LIMITED (FIFTH) E LIMITED Pursuers;against F Defender:Pursuers: Sandison QC, Watt; Shepherd & WedderburnDefender: Party Litigant27 November 2014Introduction[1] The defender was employed by the fifth pursuer between 1 September 2003 and 8… [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:29 pm
The reasoning, thanks to Justice Blackmun's obiter dictum in Jones v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 11:21 pm
But if so, it is a duty that she has assumed, not one stated in the Constitution & Canons, nor assumed by any previous Presiding Bishop. . . . [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Kehm v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am
Sprigman: this is a specific v. general placebo issue. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
After stating the amounts or percentages allowable on sums distributed by the trustee that are less than one million dollars, §326 says that the court can award the trustee “reasonable compensation not to exceed 3 percent of such moneys in excess of $1,000,000, upon all monies disbursed or turned over in the case to parties in interest, excluding the debtor [i.e., excluding Madoff]. [read post]
