Search for: "Smith v. General Services Administration"
Results 381 - 400
of 753
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm
That problem just got much bigger with the Fourth Circuit’s decision in G.G. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 5:42 pm
In Rizzuti v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 6:21 am
Roy and Lyng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 6:14 pm
Smith. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:18 am
However from this GEMA take their own administration fee (said to be 15%). [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Ontario (Ministry of Correctional Services), [2006] 2 SCR 32 Celanese Canada Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:25 am
[the order potentially] would give every state in the world jurisdiction over Google’s search services. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 3:17 pm
Looking to the Administrative Procedure Act’s general right of review, 5 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
Cybereagle’s Graham Smith gives his reaction to the report here. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am
Smith. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:19 am
As the general counsel for the Immigration and Naturalization Service during the Clinton administration correctly noted back in July 2000, “The doctrine of prosecutorial discretion applies to enforcement decisions, not benefit decisions. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Smith, Supra; Doe v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Smith, Supra; Doe v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm
., that it is devoid of any specific allegations against its Child Welfare Administration (hereinafter "CWA"). [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm
Proxy advisors Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis each published proxy access policies, with ISS generally supporting management and shareholder proposals for proxy access that comport with the 3 percent/3-year/25 percent formulation and Glass Lewis evaluating such proposals on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
” (Elonis v United States, 16). [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am
Legal systems have generated rules to control, to some extent, the administration of this form of confinement. [read post]
