Search for: "South Carolina v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 1:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Geopolitical tensions and strategic competition between the United States and China have increasingly influenced the investment landscape in recent years, implicating established regulatory frameworks such as that of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), as well as driving non-traditional government actors to take action. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:34 am
Notably, there is a similar case pending before the Fourth Circuit (covering Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia), which has the authority to uphold the rule for those states within its jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:52 am
United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:43 am
The Fourth Circuit’s decision here leans heavily on two Supreme Court precedents involving Bivens and the military context, United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:35 am
South Carolina Dep't of Corr., C/A No. 4:08-2955-CMC-TER, 2008 WL 4831484, at *1 n. 1 (D.S.C. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:17 am
United States 16-142 Issue: Whether 21 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
S. 558 (2003) and United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:07 am
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
Green Bull then appealed to the South Carolina Court of Appeals. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:34 pm
V South Carolina Art. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:44 pm
297 S.C. at 410, 377 S.E.2d at 311.ISSUE(S): The United States District Court certified a question to the South Carolina Supreme Court regarding whether blood is a product for purposes of a strict liability claim. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 10:24 am
United States and the 2011 case Kentucky v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 5:05 am
South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319, 324 (2006) (quoting Crane v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:50 am
The United States Supreme Court clarified this test in Summers v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:50 am
The United States Supreme Court clarified this test in Summers v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
Thus, not only would proponents of liberal constitutional change need to secure ratification from all states where she crossed the 40% mark – a group including states such as Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas – they also would have to pick up five states that voted more than three-to-two against Senator Clinton. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:16 am
In the amicus brief, which was filed with the United States Supreme Court in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Deliesseline: The South Carolina Negro Seaman Act of 1822 in Federal Court. [read post]
