Search for: "Spelling v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 2,445
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2020, 1:00 pm by Guest Blogger
Complete electoral meltdown was averted only two days before inauguration day, and the compromise that installed Hayes in the White House spelled the end of Southern Reconstruction, paving the way to the rise of Jim Crow in the South. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
How do states’ negotiation alternatives influence the concessions they receive in multilateral negotiations? [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm by Daphne Keller
For example, I initially read PACT to require these notices (like DMCA notices) to spell out the exact URL or location of the illegal content. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
  To state a claim under the California Voting Rights Act, you've got to establish "dilution" -- which in turn means that you've got to show that a particular district would be "majority-minority" (over 50%) to prevail. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
(See Part I here, Part II here, Part III here, Part IV here, and Part V here.)The reason for its inability is that both the Constitution (Art. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
(See Part I here, Part II here, Part III here, Part IV here, and Part V here.)The reason for its inability is that both the Constitution (Art. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
If so, how clear must they be about that exercise of state power – or how much can they conceal the state’s role by relying on platforms to prohibit “harmful” content” under Terms of Service? [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:42 pm by Josh Blackman
Dunn (1821), and the States cannot serve as laboratories for social and economic experiment, see New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:28 pm by Daphne Keller
If so, how clear must they be about that exercise of state power – or how much can they conceal the state’s role by relying on platforms to prohibit “harmful” content” under Terms of Service? [read post]