Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions Criminal Cases"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2023, 7:04 am
The trial court instructed the jury on felony larceny, conspiracy to commit felony larceny, and obtaining property by false pretenses, and the jury convicted defendant of all three, as well as habitual felony status. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 11:27 pm
In those cases where the process takes a little longer, there is the benefit of having a better jury for the case. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:50 am
(with criminal liability). [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 8:13 am
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
Hyde and Brittany Bromell, respectively, will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
Louisiana standard for jury contamination due to pretrial publicity the court noted distinct differences in the instant case. 373 U.S. 723 (1963). [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:42 am
ABA Criminal Justice Standard 3-3.9(a) states, “A prosectuor should not . . . permit the continued pendency of criminal charges in the absence of of sufficient admissible evidence to support a conviction. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 9:41 am
U.S., 347 U.S. 227 (1954), “any private communication, contact, or tampering directly or indirectly, with a juror during a [criminal] trial about matters pending before the jury is . . . deemed presumptively prejudicial. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
Alabama, 447 U.S. 625 (1980) the court mandated that, in capital cases, the jury must be instructed on, and permitted to consider, a verdict of guilt on a lesser included offense. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
The justices fast-tracked the case for argument during its April argument session, and it instructed the D.C. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
Kitchens (299 Conn. 447); "We granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal, limited to the issue of whether the Appellate Court properly determined that the defendant had waived his claim that the trial court’s instruction on reasonable doubt unfairly diluted the state’s burden of proof...the specific issue before us in the present case is whether the defendant can be deemed to have waived his objection to certain language in the final… [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
Kitchens (299 Conn. 447); "We granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal, limited to the issue of whether the Appellate Court properly determined that the defendant had waived his claim that the trial court’s instruction on reasonable doubt unfairly diluted the state’s burden of proof...the specific issue before us in the present case is whether the defendant can be deemed to have waived his objection to certain language in the final… [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:58 pm
I'm not sure what to make of this case.On the one hand, I agree that the jury instructions in the case seemed a bit confused. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 5:01 pm
Therefore, the court reasoned, it wouldn’t have made any difference if his jury had been instructed that they could convict only if they found that Greer knew he was a felon. [read post]
COURT: SIXTH AMENDMENT GIVES DEFENDANT THE RIGHT TO HAVE JURY INFORMED OF MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCE
28 May 2008, 7:00 am
[T]he question is whether the challenged instruction misled the jury as to the correct legal standard or did not adequately inform the jury on the law.' United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
The case is Young v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 11:42 am
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:20 am
” Finding no case precedent addressing the appropriate standard of review for the hybrid procedures used at trial, the appellate court held that it would “review the trial court’s order based upon the standards of review as set forth for findings of fact in criminal cases regarding motions to suppress and motions for a new trial. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:28 am
The judge not only told prospective jurors during jury selection, but then again during jury instructions. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
” The Supreme Court reversed, ruling that Elonis’s jury had been improperly instructed. [read post]
