Search for: "State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court" Results 381 - 396 of 396
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2008, 8:23 pm
The proponents of intelligent design believe it is a scientific theory that stands on equal footing with, or is superior to, current scientific theories regarding the evolution and origin of life. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 11:56 am
Pending before the Supreme Court on that day was a similar case, Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 11:28 am
Last week, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Crawford v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 5:21 pm
The California State Board of Equalization (BOE or SBE) was handed a defeat by the California Appellate Court in Dell Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
" Kemp, 231 F.3d at 230.The rationale in Kemp, with some minor semantical tweeking, should be equally applicable to conflict preemption cases involving prescription drugs. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for Wisconsin: UCP of Greater Dane County 1502 Greenway Cross Madison, WI 53713 Phone: (608) 273-4434 Fax: (608) 273-3426 E-mail: camilla@ucpdane.org Web: http://www.ucpdane.org UCP of North Central Wisconsin 740 North Third Street Wausau, WI 54403 Phone: (715) 842-8700; (800) 472-4408 (Toll Free) Fax: (715) 848-3511 E-mail: kbreitenfeldt@ucp-wausau.org Web: http://www.ucp-wausau.org UCP of Southeastern Wisconsin 7519 West Oklahoma Avenue Milwaukee, WI… [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 7:17 am
The Ohio Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains resources within the State of Ohio. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Board of Administration (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 539, 545; Guthrey v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 5:46 am
On Wednesday the Supreme Court heard arguments in Hein v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
February 5, 2007Re: The Preternaturally Prolific Posner on Plagiarism.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 6:04 am
Board of Education and bring back the days of Plessy v. [read post]
24 Dec 2000, 2:00 am
  This change reinforces the concept  recognized by the California Court of appeals in Beehan v Lido Isle Community Association that not all association disputes have to be enforced or resolved by the association. [read post]