Search for: "State of California, ex rel"
Results 381 - 400
of 844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 8:30 am
Perhaps our legislature should review this law and enact a similar law in our state. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:03 pm
Fundamentally, it sustains the view found in Com. ex rel McNutt. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
The non-California claims could be brought in those plaintiffs’ home states, so litigation tourists go away and stop clogging our courts. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
The California judge who ruled on Findley v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
The case is captioned as U.S. and State of Wisconsin ex rel. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 8:00 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 1:38 pm
Decisions by the Supreme Courts of both the United States and California have stressed the free speech rights of politicians who espouse the concerns of the electorate. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 11:41 am
State of California ex rel 14th District Agricultural Association (3d Dist. 2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 152, rev. gtd. and action deferred 7/9/14. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:56 am
” The court of appeal stated that a “close review of the relevant traffic measures undermine[d]” this argument. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
In the comment property states of Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin, community property is usually divided 50-50. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 6:30 pm
While custodial interference typically occurs in situations of exes that are not on good terms with each other, the crime itself does not have to be committed by another parent or relative. [read post]
