Search for: "State v Simpson" Results 381 - 400 of 792
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2013, 9:17 am by Michelle Yeary
  At least one California state court said no – Simpson v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:19 pm
  The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant's constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 3:39 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
James Simpson, No. 105,182 (Jefferson)State appealJohn R. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
Before Clackamas, the federal appeals courts “had similarly focused on the actual working relationship between an individual and the partnership when inquiring whether the individual was an employee within the meaning of the ADEA,” according to Mastroianni, citing the Sixth Circuit’s 1997 decision in Simpson v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 5:19 pm
  The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant’s constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:30 am by Rumpole
 Legally, the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 4:28 pm by Cynthia Alkon
  Simpson is reportedly stating that if the offer had been conveyed, he would have taken it rather than going forward with trial. [read post]